Concept Search Vs Keyword Search

Concept Search Vs Keyword Search




Litigation processes are becoming more complicate and the use of progressive technology has become a necessity. Lawyers and judges are turning to electronic discovery for assistance in solving legal proceedings as early as possible. One integral part of the litigation course of action is search. Searching for applicable information can be both perplexing and non-satisfying when an incorrect approach is implemented, making the whole course of action worthless and redundant.

Keyword Search

There are two basic types of search that can be achieved in-house or provided as electronic discovery sets. They are keyword search and concept search, though more and more new and inventive searches are making their entries too. The traditional system of electronic data discovery search pertains to keyword search, where an attorney searches for specific terms or phrases that are critically related to the case.

Keyword search is effective when the exact search operations are conducted without any spelling errors or abbreviated versions. The search engine fails to deliver satisfactory results in the case of abbreviations, synonyms, misspelled terms, etc. Keyword search does not have the flexibility to conduct searches on a wide spectrum of terms that could have meaningful bearing on the case.

situations are never simple. People indulging in illegal activities usually use conceal expressions and phrases to communicate their actions and outcomes, allowing them to easily slip by. The main drawback of keyword searching is that it can rule to either excessive results, which may or may not be applicable to the case, or to inadequate results, where applicable documents may be deleted. In either case it can cripple legal proceedings.

Concept Search

In concept search, the tools return a list of documents that not only contain exact terms, but also those that are conceptually related to the topic, providing a wider search scope capability. Concept search depends on complex algorithms to estimate the relevance of a set of documents to a concept. Concept search helps clarify and group similar documents together, which expedites the reviewing course of action.

For organizations, a truly effective search is particularly helpful as it helps investigators separate many vague and unanswered questions. The employees of a company who use code words to hide their true intentions can be exposed with the concept search methodology.

Best of both the worlds

Despite concept search being the preferred option for some, as a standalone procedure it cannot give accurate results. searches can also find more than the necessary documents as it searches for related terms in addition. This can rule to wasteful results and lose its purpose.

The aim is to cull data, and the use of progressive analytical methodologies is the meaningful to success. The use of keyword search along with concept search can produce the best results and create the most popular condition for litigations and edisclosure. The keyword search function can be implemented to find results for specific questions like who, what, when, how, why, etc. It can cull the data and remove irrelevant documents to produce a filtered set for review purposes.

Highly targeted concept search can help investigators review situations in a comprehensive manner. The secret is to use the methodology that is best suited for the case and will best help to meet the objectives.




leave your comment

Top